Case study is a common expression in qualitative research and the use varies enormously amongst time and researchers, and, sometimes, its meaning is just taken for granted.

After some time also using the expression vaguely, I found the chapter So, what are case studies? in the book What's wrong with ethnography?, by Martyn Hammersley. The author has published many books about research in education, therefore, his ideas must be seen as part of a whole set of ideas and definitions.

What I like about him is not only the quality and clarity of his writings, but also his opposition to the traditional division between qualitative and quantitative research and his straight forward definition of terms that are used quite often (and losely) in educational research, such as ethnography and case study.

In this post, I will present briefly his definition of case study by presenting the following scheme he suggests in order to describe a research design:

research design according to Hammersley

From the scheme above, it is clear that the author uses a "much narrower definition of case study than conventional" (p. 185). The author considers case study as one of the options for selection of cases together with experiment and survey. Then, to characterize the strengths and weaknesses of a case study, the author compares it with the other two options.

Mainly, comparing case studies to surveys, the author argues that there is a trade off between number of cases (then, representativeness of the sample) and amount of detail (then, degree of likely accuracy). When comparing case studies to experiments, the authors argues that there is a trade off between degree of control (then, possibility of coming to sound conclusions about causal relationship) and degree of reactivity (then, artificiality of the results).

I imagine that his ideas may sound simplistic for some people involved in educational research, but they are very coherent specially when one takes into account all of Hammersley's ideas about research design.

Rererence: Hammersley, M. (1992). What is wrong with ethnography? Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Routledge.

About this post

Date: 28 Apr 2015

Author: Leonardo Barichello

Tags:

research methodology education english


Related posts:
How does caffeine keep us awake?
Portuguese food (and dessert!) in Nottingham
Implications of Giaquinto’s epistemology of visual thinking for teaching and learning of fractions
Cordas vivas, by Heraldo do Monte
Bakewell tart
BarraQDA - NvivoTools
steve jobs
Nottingham Doughnut Co.
spanish croquetas
Coffees
OpenQDA, an open software for qualitative data analysis
Hypocrisy (hipocrisia)
Linear number board games and low income young children’s numerical knowledge
Changing the font size for all equations in LibreOffice Writer
My view on the paper "Learning to 'See' Less Than Nothing"
Drury: brilliant coffees in the UK
The best stroopwafels in Amsterdam
Progress bar for LibreOffice Impress
Fractions operations and informal knowledge
Beer in Nottingham
Coffee in Nottingham
Food in Nottingham
Dança das cabeças
Small icons for Breeze (Plasma 5)
Home-made chantilly
Hummus
Office 2010 Pro on Kubuntu 15.04 through wine
Visual resources and low prior knowledge
Brownie (small portion)
Software for transcriptions: oTranscribe
Tangram of thirds
Sesc Instrumental
The sexism of the film "x+y"
Marcos Suzano (o homem por tras de muita coisa boa)
The last banana: A thought experiment in probability
The best coffee on Ireland
Hello world!

← Back to blog